everestbasecamp.tours

Every figure on this site carries a source and a date.

Three passes route

The Everest three passes trek: one circuit, three high crossings

The Everest three passes trek walks the classic route to Everest Base Camp and joins three high crossings into a single circuit. Kongma La is 5,535 m (18,159 ft), Cho La is 5,420 m (17,782 ft) and Renjo La is 5,360 m (17,585 ft). Those are three different heights, and any page that gives you one figure for all three has not checked. This is the hardest route we run in this region that involves no climbing, and it is not simply a longer version of the classic trek.

5,535mKongma La, the highest of the three passes and the hardest day on the circuit. That is 18,159 ft, and it is higher than Everest Base Camp itself.

The three passes

Kongma La, Cho La and Renjo La are three different heights

The three passes are Kongma La at 5,535 m (18,159 ft), Cho La at 5,420 m (17,782 ft) and Renjo La at 5,360 m (17,585 ft). Kongma La is the highest of the three and it is generally the hardest day on the circuit.1

None of the three is a climb. There is no rope on any of them on the trekking route, and you carry no technical equipment. What each one is instead is a long day on rough ground, starting in the dark, with the top of it higher than Everest Base Camp itself.

The three Everest high passes, each with its own verified height, checked 12 September 2026
PassHeightWhat it links
Kongma La5,535 m (18,159 ft)Chhukung, east of Dingboche, to Lobuche on the base camp trail. The highest of the three and generally the hardest.
Cho La5,420 m (17,782 ft)The base camp corridor to the Gokyo valley. The only one of the three on the shorter Gokyo route.
Renjo La5,360 m (17,585 ft)The Gokyo valley west into the Thame valley, and the way out to Namche Bazaar.

Feet are computed by the page from the verified meter figure. No feet figure on this site is typed by a writer. Heights checked 12 September 2026.

Why you will see one figure for all three, and why it is wrong

Somewhere on almost every site that sells this trek, including our own parent company’s gear list article, the three passes are given a single height of about the Cho La figure, 5,420 m (17,782 ft). That figure is correct for Cho La. It is wrong for the other two, by enough to matter.3

Kongma La is higher than Cho La by 115 m (377 ft), and Renjo La is lower than Cho La. Put it another way: Kongma La stands 171 m (561 ft) above Everest Base Camp. If you are planning around the wrong number you are planning around the wrong day.

We hold the three as three separate verified rows, from specialist consensus across multiple independent non-operator sources, and our store carries a written instruction on that record never to publish one elevation covering all three.1 Every height on the route, settled and unsettled, is on the page about every elevation on the Everest Base Camp route.

Kongma La, the highest and the hardest day

You cross Kongma La between Chhukung at 4,730 m (15,518 ft) and Lobuche at 4,910 m (16,109 ft). From Chhukung the climb to the pass is 805 m (2,641 ft), and the descent on the far side is 625 m (2,051 ft) of height given back in one afternoon.

Three things make it the hardest of the three. The height, which is the greatest of any point on this circuit except Kala Patthar at 5,545 m (18,192 ft). The ground, which is boulder field for much of the climb and has no trail in the usual sense, so you follow cairns. And the end of the day, which crosses the Khumbu Glacier before it reaches Lobuche. Glacier here means a river of ice covered in loose rock, not a snowfield. You walk it, you do not rope up, and it is slow and awkward when you are already tired.

It is also the least visited of the three, because the shorter pass routes do not include it. Our own route ledger carries published distances and walking times for the Gokyo links and carries nothing at all for this crossing, which tells you how little of the industry actually documents it.3 We are not going to invent a figure to fill that gap.

Cho La, the link between the two valleys

Cho La at 5,420 m (17,782 ft) is the crossing between the base camp corridor and the Gokyo valley. It has a short section of glacier near the top where you may be walking on snow and ice rather than rock, and it is the pass most likely to be shut after a snowfall.

Cho La is also the one pass you can cross without doing the whole circuit. The shorter route that goes to base camp and crosses Cho La into Gokyo, without Kongma La and without Renjo La, has a page of its own: the Gokyo and Cho La route to Everest Base Camp. If you want the lakes and one pass rather than three, read that one instead of this one.

Renjo La, the quiet one, and the way out

Renjo La at 5,360 m (17,585 ft) takes you west out of the Gokyo valley and down into the Thame valley, which most people on this route see on the last walking days. It is the lowest of the three and usually the most straightforward, and the view back east from the top is the one people describe for years afterwards.

It is quiet in a way the rest of the Khumbu is not. Below the pass you drop into a valley with few lodges and few people in them, and you rejoin the main trail only at Namche Bazaar at 3,440 m (11,286 ft). That is part of the argument for walking the circuit in this direction, and it is covered in the next section.

One more thing about this side of the circuit. 7 of the places you sleep in or climb on this route are named on this page with no height at all: Gokyo village, Gokyo Ri, Dzongla, Thagnak, Lungden, Thame and Gorak Shep. Our own ledger holds more than one published figure for each of them and not one has been settled against a primary source.2 Where you meet them elsewhere on this site you get the spread and a marker, never a single confident figure.

The circuit

What the circuit links, and why most itineraries cross Kongma La first

The circuit links three valleys. You walk up the main Khumbu valley to base camp, cross east to west over the three passes, and come out down the Thame valley. Almost every itinerary, ours included, crosses Kongma La first, Cho La second and Renjo La last.

Here is the shape of it in one paragraph. You fly to Lukla at 2,860 m (9,383 ft) and walk the standard trail up to Namche Bazaar at 3,440 m (11,286 ft) and on to Dingboche at 4,410 m (14,469 ft), with the two acclimatization stops every good itinerary on this route builds in. You then turn east to Chhukung at 4,730 m (15,518 ft), cross Kongma La, and come down to Lobuche at 4,910 m (16,109 ft) on the base camp trail. You walk to Everest Base Camp at 5,364 m (17,598 ft) and up Kala Patthar at 5,545 m (18,192 ft) in the dark. Then you turn west, cross Cho La into the Gokyo valley and its lakes, cross Renjo La out of it, and walk down the Thame valley to Namche Bazaar and back to Lukla.

Why that direction, and not the other way round

The order is not arbitrary and it is worth understanding, because it is the thing that decides whether your body is ready for the first crossing.

Going this way you spend the first week on the classic corridor. That means you sleep two nights at Namche Bazaar and two nights at Dingboche before you go over anything, on a trail with lodges every couple of hours, a hospital above Namche and the Himalayan Rescue Association aid post at Pheriche. By the time you start up Kongma La you have been going uphill for about a week and you are already sleeping above four thousand meters. What acclimatization is and why it takes days rather than fitness is on the page about altitude sickness and acclimatization on this trek.

The reverse order sends you over Renjo La in your first week, from the Thame valley, before you have spent any real time high, and it puts the hardest crossing at the end when you are tired. Our own Island Peak version of this trek does run that way, for reasons to do with the climb rather than the walk.3 For a trekking trip there is no good reason to choose it.

The second argument for this direction is about what you lose if something goes wrong. Going Kongma La first puts Everest Base Camp in the middle of your trip rather than at the end. If a later pass is shut, or the weather turns, or you have to come down, you have already stood at base camp. Put base camp last and a bad week costs you the thing you came for.

This page prints no walking hours and no distance between any two places on the circuit. Our own itineraries disagree with each other about both, sometimes by hours on a single leg, and averaging numbers we have not settled would be exactly the trick the rest of this site refuses. What we can show you is the reconciled shape of the route on the page about the Everest Base Camp route, distance and map, and the night by night version of the classic corridor on the Everest Base Camp itinerary, day by day.

Days

It takes longer than the classic trek, and we will not print one day count

Our classic Everest Base Camp trek runs 15 days door to door from Kathmandu. The three passes circuit is longer than that on every version of it we sell. How much longer is a question our own product page currently answers two different ways, so this page answers it in words rather than in a number.

First, which kind of day. That day count is trip days, Kathmandu to Kathmandu, which is what you are sold and what you book flights around. It is not the same as trail days, which count only the days you actually walk, Lukla to Lukla. The page about the Everest Base Camp itinerary, day by day counts trail days, so a number there and a number here will not match, and neither is wrong.

Now the problem. Our parent company sells this circuit as Everest Three High Pass Trek, and its own page carries one duration in its trip facts panel and a different one in its own FAQ, further down the same page. Our fact store records that as a finding rather than quietly picking the larger of the two.

Our audit row for this product, held as a verified finding in our own store, reads: Consistent pricing. Product is 20 days while the FAQ says 17. Trip facts best season includes monsoon while the FAQ says spring and autumn only. Until the operator settles it, no page on this site publishes a single day count for the three passes trek.3 Checked 12 September 2026.

So here is what we can tell you honestly. Both of the figures our own page carries are longer than the classic trek, and even the shorter of the two is longer than it. The extra days buy three things: the Gokyo valley, the Thame valley, and the three crossing days themselves, none of which exists on the out and back route.

Then add slack on top of whatever number you are given. A closed pass costs days you cannot make up, the flight in and out of Lukla depends on the weather in both directions, and a circuit gives you fewer places to cut a day than an out and back route does. If your return flight is tight, this is the wrong trek. Ask us for the day count on the dates you are looking at and we will send the itinerary we would actually run, not a brochure figure.

The same goes for the price. There is no single published price for the three passes trek yet. The price comes to you in writing, in the quote for your dates, before you pay anything.

The honest part

Four things make this genuinely harder than the classic trek

People assume the three passes trek is the classic trek with some extra scenery. It is not. It is a harder trip in four specific ways, and every one of them compounds the others.

The classic trek

One valley, walked up and walked back down.

No pass crossings. Two days above five thousand meters, both at the end. A lower village within a few hours from almost anywhere on the route.

The three passes circuit

Three valleys, walked as a loop.

Three high crossings. Five days above five thousand meters on our own itinerary. Days where the only way off is forward over a pass or back the way you came.3

Three high crossings, and each one is a full day

A pass day is not a normal walking day with a hill in it. You start before light, you climb for hours on ground that is loose or icy or both, you stand at the top for a few minutes because it is cold and windy, and then you lose most of the height again before you can stop. There is no lodge at the top and no way to shorten the day once you have committed to it.

You do that three times on this circuit, on days that are already spread through a long trip. The classic trek never asks it of you. That difference is the whole trek in one line.

More days on foot, one after another

The thing our guides watch go wrong most often on the classic route is not a single hard day. It is the fourth or fifth day in a row, when yesterday is still in your legs and you sleep badly because of the altitude. This circuit adds days to that, and puts three of the hardest ones late in the trip.

Train for consecutive days rather than for one big day. Somebody who can walk hard once a week has prepared for the wrong thing. The self test, the sixteen week plan and the honest beginner answer are all on what makes this trek hard, and everything it says applies here with more of it.

Much longer above five thousand meters

On the classic trek you go above five thousand meters on two days, both near the end, and you sleep that high for one or two nights. On our own three passes itinerary you go above that height on five separate days, spread across the second half of the trip.3

That matters because thin air is cumulative in a way one hard day is not. You eat less than you should. You sleep worse every night. Small injuries stop healing. Nothing dramatic happens, and then late in the second week you find you have nothing left, on a morning that needs a pass crossing out of you. Being fit does not protect you from any of it. Going up slowly and eating properly does, a bit.

Less margin when the weather turns

On the classic route you are rarely more than a few hours above a lower village, and the way out is simply the way you came in. On the circuit there are stretches, above Chhukung, at Dzongla, between Gokyo and the Thame valley, where the choice is to go forward over a pass or to walk back a long way.

Weather takes that choice away from you, and it does so at the worst height. There is no shortcut off the top of a pass. A guide who decides at six in the morning that today is not the day is not being cautious. They are doing the one part of the job that actually matters. When to go, and what each month is really like, is on the best time to do this trek, month by month.

Plan for this

A pass can be closed, and you have to accept that before you book

Any of the three can be impassable, and Cho La is the one it happens to most. Fresh snow, ice on the glacier section, or wind on the top can shut a crossing for a day or for a week. This is normal. It is not a sign that something has gone wrong.

When it happens there are three moves and your guide picks one on the morning. You wait a day where you are and try again. You go round, which on this circuit usually means losing height and walking back up the main valley, and costs more days than waiting. Or you cut that pass out and finish the trip with two crossings instead of three.

What we will not do is put a group over a pass in conditions our guide does not like, and we will not let a client talk us into it because they have a flight home. That sounds obvious written down. It is one of the common ways people get into serious trouble on this route, and the pressure is almost always coming from the trekker rather than from the operator.

So book this trek with two things in place. Days of slack after your planned finish, because you will need them more often than not. And the acceptance, made now rather than at four in the morning at Dzongla, that you might come home having crossed two passes. People who agree to that in advance have a good trip when it happens. People who do not, do not.

You also need travel insurance that covers helicopter evacuation. We require it, and we do not sell it. For treks and passes like this circuit, the policy must cover you to at least 6,000 m (19,685 ft). What to check before you buy is on travel insurance for the Everest Base Camp trek.

Here is what that means if you need to come down by helicopter. We have no standing contract with any helicopter or rescue company, so there is no provider of ours to name. Your own insurer decides and sends the helicopter under your policy, and our guide makes the call to your insurer from the trail. So your policy has to name helicopter evacuation and repatriation, because nothing of ours stands behind it if it does not. Carry your insurer’s emergency number and your policy number, and give both to us before you fly.

Who it is for

What we ask of you, and who should not attempt this

This trek suits somebody who has already done a multi day trek, preferably at altitude, who can walk long days on rough ground for more than two weeks running, and who has slack in the calendar. That is the specification, and we mean all three parts of it.

On fitness, the bar is higher than the classic trek in a specific way rather than in general. You do not need to be faster. You need to still be walking well near the end of the trip, and to have a hard day left in you after two weeks of ordinary ones. The way to find out is to walk two long hilly days back to back, with a day pack, at the end of a week in which you already walked. If that second morning is a problem now, it will be a much bigger problem at Chhukung.

On experience, we ask for a previous multi day trek because of what goes wrong rather than because of the walking. Somebody who has been out for a week before knows what their own body does when it is tired and cold, knows how to look after their feet, and knows to say something early. On this route those three habits are worth more than a faster time up the hill.

Do not attempt this trek if any of these is true

This is the part most pages leave out, so here it is plainly. Do not attempt the three passes circuit if this would be your first trek at altitude. Do not attempt it if reading the difficulty page for the classic trek already sounded like it was at the edge of what you could do, because this is harder than that in every direction. Do not attempt it if you have a heart or lung condition that your own doctor has not specifically cleared for high altitude, and do not attempt it if you are pregnant.

Do not attempt it on a fixed schedule with no slack, because a closed pass will take days you do not have. Do not attempt it if you are unwilling to turn around, because the people who get hurt on this route are almost never the ones who turned back. And do not attempt it if you are doing it to prove something, which sounds like a sermon and is one of the more reliable warnings we have.

If any of that describes you today, the answer is not no, it is not yet. Walk the classic Everest Base Camp trek first, or the Gokyo and Cho La route with one pass instead of three, and come back for this one. Both of those are real treks and neither is a consolation prize.

The promise we will make you is the one that separates an operator from a booking site. Tell us what you have walked, what you can walk now and when you want to go. If the three passes circuit is the wrong choice we will say so and name the trek that fits instead. We would rather lose the booking than put somebody on a pass that was never right for them.

The reason to do it

What the circuit gives you that the classic trek cannot

Everything above is the cost. This is what you are buying with it, and for the right walker it is worth all of it. Three valleys instead of one, the Gokyo lakes, and long stretches of trail with almost nobody on them.

Start with the shape of the trip. The classic trek walks one corridor up and walks the same corridor back down, so roughly half your days are ground you have already seen. A circuit does not repeat itself. You come out down a different valley from the one you went up, and the last walking days are new country rather than a rewind.

Then the Gokyo valley, which is the part people who have done both talk about afterwards. It holds a chain of glacial lakes beside the Ngozumpa Glacier, held sacred by both Hindus and Buddhists, and our own route records say the viewpoint above the village shows four eight thousand meter peaks on a clear morning.3 Our ledger holds more than one published height for both the village and the viewpoint and has settled neither, so this page names them and gives no figure.2 The valley in detail belongs to the Gokyo and Cho La route to Everest Base Camp.

Then the emptiness. The main trail to base camp carries most of the traffic in the Khumbu, and in October you will not often be walking alone on it. Above Chhukung and in the Thame valley you can go a long way without meeting anybody. We publish no visitor count for either, because nobody publishes a trustworthy one and we are not going to make one up. What we will say is that our guides describe the Kongma La and the Thame valley as the quietest days on any route we run in this region.

Last, and this matters more than it sounds: you still get the whole of the walk to Everest Base Camp inside this trip. Base camp at 5,364 m (17,598 ft), the dawn climb up Kala Patthar at 5,545 m (18,192 ft), Namche Bazaar, the monastery at Tengboche. You are not trading the classic trek for the passes. You are adding to it.

The variant

The version with Island Peak is a climb, not a walk

There is a second product that walks the same three passes and adds a summit: Everest High Pass with Island Peak, which climbs Island Peak at 6,189 m (20,305 ft), also called Imja Tse. It is a separate trip, not an upgrade you decide on at Chhukung, and the difference is a difference in kind.

Everything on this page so far describes walking. Island Peak is mountaineering. You use crampons, a harness, an ice axe and a rope, you climb fixed ropes on a headwall below the summit ridge, and you cross a glacier where being roped together is the point rather than a formality. It is at the approachable end of climbing. It is still climbing, and the first time you put crampons on should not be on the mountain.

In outline, the trip walks the three passes in the reverse order to the trekking version, Renjo La first and Kongma La last, then goes from Chhukung up to Island Peak base camp, camps there rather than using a lodge, and climbs to the summit and back in one long night and day.3 The climbing permit for it is issued by Nepal Mountaineering Association, and the climb needs a guide qualified for it rather than a trekking guide.

Two honest notes before you ask us about it. The first is that our parent company’s page for that product currently contradicts itself about what is included, including whether porter service is part of it, so this page states none of its inclusions. Ask for porter service to be written into your quote.3 That trip does have a confirmed price, and it is printed on the three passes with Island Peak page, along with what to check on the quote. The second is that adding a summit to a trip that already has three passes in it makes a hard trip considerably harder, and it is the wrong place to try climbing for the first time. If you want the summit, ask us and we will tell you honestly whether to do it with the passes or on its own.

Questions

Three passes questions people ask us

What are the Cho La, Renjo La and Kongma La passes?

They are the three high passes of the Everest region, and they are three different heights. Kongma La is 5,535 m and is the highest and generally the hardest, crossed between Chhukung and Lobuche. Cho La is 5,420 m and links the Everest Base Camp trail with the Gokyo valley. Renjo La is 5,360 m and takes you west out of the Gokyo valley into the Thame valley. None of the three is a technical climb on the trekking route, and no page should give a single elevation covering all three, because only Cho La is 5,420 m.

Which of the three passes is the hardest?

Kongma La. It is the highest of the three at 5,535 m (18,159 ft), the climb from Chhukung is 805 m (2,641 ft), much of it is boulder field rather than trail, and the day finishes by crossing the Khumbu Glacier before it reaches Lobuche. Cho La is the one most likely to be closed by snow, which is a different problem.

How long does the Everest three passes trek take?

Longer than the classic trek, which we sell as 15 days door to door from Kathmandu. We publish no single day count for the three passes circuit, because our own product page currently states one figure in its trip facts and a different one in its own FAQ, and we would rather say that than pick one. Ask us for the exact itinerary on your dates.

Do you need climbing experience for the three passes trek?

No, because there is no climbing on it. All three passes are walked, with no rope and no technical equipment. You do need previous multi day trekking experience, preferably at altitude, which is a different thing. The version that adds the Island Peak summit is genuine mountaineering and does need climbing skill.

Can you do the three passes trek without going to Everest Base Camp?

You can, because the circuit itself does not pass through base camp, and the side trip from Lobuche is a choice. Almost nobody makes that choice. You have walked for well over a week to stand within a day of it, and skipping it saves less time than people expect.

Is the three passes trek worth it over the classic trek?

It is if you have the experience and the days for it, and it is not if you are stretching for either. You get three valleys instead of one, the Gokyo lakes, quiet trail on the crossings, and base camp as well. You pay for that with three pass days, more days above five thousand meters, and a real chance of losing days to weather.

Sources

Where these figures come from

Every number above is listed here with the body that publishes it and the date we last read it. If a figure has changed since, write to us and we will correct the page and say that we did.

  1. The three Everest pass elevations Kongma La, Cho La and Renjo La are held as three separate verified rows in our fact store, taken from specialist consensus across multiple independent non-operator sources. The individual sources are listed in our research file, which is an internal document with no public address. The record carries a written instruction never to publish one elevation covering all three passes, which is why this page prints three. Checked 12 September 2026.
  2. Our own reconciliation of the route elevations Every height on this page comes from our fact store, which collects each published value for each place and marks the ones that disagree. Gokyo village, Gokyo Ri, Dzongla, Thagnak, Lungden, Thame and Gorak Shep all carry more than one published figure and none has been settled against a primary source, so this page names them and prints no height. The full ledger is on the elevation page. Checked 12 September 2026.
  3. Our own product estate: the three passes itineraries and their day counts The order the passes are crossed, the days spent above five thousand meters, the outline of the Island Peak version and the conflicting day counts are all read from the published itineraries of Nepal Unique Treks and Expedition Pvt Ltd, the licensed Kathmandu operator this site belongs to, as recorded in our store. They are quoted as evidence of what our own estate currently publishes, including where it contradicts itself, never as verified figures. No public document collects them, which is why there is no link on this row. Checked 12 September 2026.

Keep reading

Where to go next

Tell us what you have walked and we will tell you straight

Send us your previous treks, the time you have, and the dates you are looking at. We will come back with the itinerary we would actually run, the day count for those dates, and a direct answer on whether the three passes circuit is the right trek for you or whether the classic route is. No deposit is taken to answer a question.

Ask about the three passes

Published 12 September 2026. Last checked 12 September 2026 against the issuing authorities. A hollow circle marks a figure we have not settled yet. A half circle marks one where two authorities disagree, and we show both.